|MELIORITE| commented on a Page, Auto  -  May 15, 2007

We can see that anyone can use it to give themselves op, voice etc in a chan. That does not change the point that an @ should be included (see my earlier message), because if whoever holds the script is deopped the will keep getting messages like \" you are not channel operator\". Personally, its not a script I would use, but that is another matter. The point about why having the script notice the person requesting the op, voice etc is a good point. Once a person makes the command, it is self evident whether or not it has been executed... the only reason I can see it being of use is that somebody can potentially pm the script holder or bot and request op in a chan without looking in there and be informed of the result: /msg +o <#chan>. I still see this as incomplete.

 Respond  
Are you sure you want to unfollow this person?
Are you sure you want to delete this?
Click "Unsubscribe" to stop receiving notices pertaining to this post.
Click "Subscribe" to resume notices pertaining to this post.