Jethro commented on a Page, connection killer  -  Jul 16, 2010

The regex will either match luscious and lucious only and nothing else.

No, it's not equivalent to luscious

luscious is pretty much equivalent to: if luscious isin $1- or luscious iswm $1-

I wouldn't recommend that you use the wild-card (iswm) or the isin operator, because if someone says the adverb "lusciously," he or she will get k-lined!

Your initial text event was okay, because you didn't insert the asterisk at both ends of the word luscious. But it'll still match for one word, and not "lucious"

 Respond  
Are you sure you want to unfollow this person?
Are you sure you want to delete this?
Click "Unsubscribe" to stop receiving notices pertaining to this post.
Click "Subscribe" to resume notices pertaining to this post.