http://www.hawkee.com/snippet/8799/ This i also another example of something similar to what you have created here. Take a hint that not everyones Nicklist will show up as the color green so + -V would be more suitable.Other wise nice snippet.

MakiMaki goes to a server i go to also :P

makimaki i talk to commonknowledge in chatrooms. therefore i explain what i need to there:P haha

Ladies, Take your quarrel off my snippet post pl0x. makimaki, thanks for the last comment, thank you all for the suggestions.

would you like some cheese with that?
I pointed out you had a valid point and stated a likely fact you would make a post in regards to the op flag in the on text event. as you have many times in the past.

as for jaytea's post I fully agree with it..
The only person that bother to post the code and still be in the same format that the poster posted was blackvenomm666 and the only one to go and explain the code tho still did not explain why it was used was Abcdefmonkey

I find it rather rude that no one bother to go hey good job and here is how I do it and this is why. the user is a new coder and no one bother to explain as they butchered the post making it "Better" when in fact it was fine how it was.
before any one goes and rewrites some ones work.. at least explain why so they can learn.. and be sure its better.. not just look cooler.

Perhaps refine was a wrong word. Example was the one that should be used. jaytea always has something discouraging, depending on whom he comes across, to say of the comments he sees otherwise. I don't, and will never, claim myself as a regex God but am here to help with the best of my knowledge. And MakiMaki, what makes you think I'll take my time to "go on" about your comments when you've tagged along after jaytea? What good does that do?

On @*:Text:*:#:{ 
var %i $strip($1)
  if (%i == !green) {
    mode # +v $nick 
    msg # Here ya go, $nick
  }
  elseif (%i == !ungreen) {
    mode # -v $nick 
    msg # There ya go, $nick
} }

donno for sure about the local var use or just having the strip command twice I am sure jaytea can better say if it be better or not, replaced the $chan with #.. I get drilled about elseif use so I been using it more. and added a check if your oped.. as Jethro will go on about it ... he prob right it s a good idea to have if the op you hold is not all the time

hmmmmm

Just a little refinement on the regex suggestion:

you haven't "refined" it by making the contents of the event bulkier than in Wader's example.

and once again, the original code is the cleanest and most suitable of the bunch :/

jethro == regex god

Yeah true, it was a good example though, to be fair.

Yeah...ok. :P

Actually, though, you could do:

.msg # $iif($regml(1) = un,Th,H) $+ ere ya go, $nick

The extra letter e is not needed. :P

That didn't enter my my mind when I posted my example...

Just want to say though Jethro, you should of put:

.msg # $iif($regml(1) = un,Th,he) $+ ere ya go, $nick

Like:

.msg # $iif($regml(1) = un,The,He) $+ re ya go, $nick

Jethro's "regex" suggestion actually work's. xD

Just a little refinement on the regex suggestion:

on @$*:text:/^[!.@](un)?(green)$/Si:#:{
 mode # $iif($regml(1) = un,-,+) $+ v $nick
 .msg # $iif($regml(1) = un,Th,he) $+ ere ya go, $nick
}

@CommonKnowledge

Tokenize just sets the $1 $2 etc spots that are separated by the character specified. For example

 tokenize 58 hey:hi:whats up

Separates each of those into $1 $2 $3 respectively because they're separated by $chr(58) which is the colon ( : ). So, $1 = hey $2 = hi $3 = whats up

In Blackvenom666's snippet he used

tokenize 32 $strip($1-)

This does exactly as the example I showed you for a better understanding. Except his is separated by a space ($chr(32))

Hope that helps. :) Also, you can refer to //help in mIRC for anything else. Other than that, feel free to ask any questions :)

I mean i know what you have the $strip($1-) there for, but Tokenize has me confused -.-

tokenize 32 means what?

On ^*:Text:*:#:{ 
tokenize 32 $strip($1-)
  if ($1 == !green) {
    mode $chan +v $nick 
    msg $chan Here ya go, $nick
  }
  if ($1 == !ungreen) {
    mode $chan -v $nick 
    msg $chan There ya go, $nick
  }
}

wader he's new to scripting lets try to leave the regex out of it for now. haha

Does that change anything? or is that the same thing just written differently?

on $*:TEXT:/^[!@.](un)?green/Si:#: {
    mode $chan $iif($regml(1),-,+) $+ v $nick
    msg $chan $iif($regml(1),Th,H) $+ ere ya go, $nick
}