Yeah Punk, I think he should have used BadwordHere iswm $1- But it's still not the best method as it can trigger within a word. There are also ways to go about a bad word script effectively.

i still find it funny that he used
$1- == BADWORD_HERE
and noone had pointed out the fact that i could type

hi FUCKFACE

and get away with swearing!!!

excuse the language.

btw that !@#$ bla bla was an actual word,
damn hawkee and his censorship lmfso

oh well regex gets me everytime, well done boys.

Yes, Gummo's got me...lol And he's right. Using the positive lookahead in this case is a waste. I agree with his initial method. :-)

He didn't make the k optional.
That would be f(ark|uck?)
He instead used a positive lookahead.

cos some people might just write
fuc
??

..but why would you waste space when you don't need to use the 'k' in another match?

Or:

/f(uc|ar)(?=k)/iS

Also, f(ark|uck) == f(ar|uc)k for future reference.

LMFAO, i just realised i did that :P, wow, halarioussss :) on $*:TEXT:/(F(ark|uck)|Bitch|ass|whore|OtherBadWordsInThisForm)/Si:#: :).

Perhaps he simply doesn't understand regex and copy/pasted that after modifying it.

Yeah napa, I think ghost-writer's got too much to chew.

ghost-writer, don't act childish please. It's true that you can use the on text regex to do the same thing, but why [.!@]? You don't treat regex as your personal distribution of which you copy and paste everything for your sheer enjoyment.

Plus your regex will require the .,! or @ affixes to the bad words to work.

napa182 dont worry, it's ok how you did. I've tried and that's all I need :-)
Probably next time I'll restrict the code only for no-ops/no-voices

@Ghost-writer wtf are you doing? why give people the wrong way to make the script for?

Wtf?!

on $@*:TEXT:/^[.!@](F(ark|uck)|Bitch|ass|whore|OtherBadWordsInThisForm)/Si:#: {
  ban -uk300 $nick Swear words are prohibited! $regml(1) 
}

I WIN.

Ah okay! thank you

@Ange no need for the 2 events as in ban and kick you can use

ban -ku60 # $nick 2 Vocabulario inadecuado

napa182 you resolved it to me. Thank you!!
I added ban on ip with 1mn timer. Error of line 2 resolved by using various lines. Final code on my script:

on @:TEXT::#:{
if ($regex($1-,/puta|cabron|marica)/) { ban -u60 $chan $nick 2 | kick $chan $nick Vocabulario inadecuado }
}

LOL I post and help, But for submitting a code na I keep them to myself or on my website LOL :)

Oh Irchainscriptz is that why you dont post anything?

Ok this is the thing i dont get, if a person ripps snippets why help? No logic to it!And as for deleting post or comments ..kinda childish dont you think? As Warchild stated you have to take critism and learn to deal with the good and the bad! if you dont want critism dont post anything ( Simple )

bullet, i have read through the comments from some of the best scripters on hawkee, and i have noticed you can't take critism, as i have said on your previous ripped snippets, the reason for hawkee is to get comments/rates/likes and act on those. so when you go to delete a comment which could actually be helpful if not to you, but to others think again.

no need to put it twice cuz of the s

$regex($1-,/bad|word(s)?|here)/)

Note that 'black' is not a swear word. -.-

The First 'Black' is N,igger the second is N,iggers ... it changes them auto

.mode $chan +b $+ $address($$1,5)

"$+" Why? -- "$$1" Why?

Ok, that explains it. Bullet_Dodger is to blame. :P

If you scroll up a little more, you will see that Superior posted the code that actually Bullet_Dodger posted, and he was only making the comment that the code wouldnt work like that.

And you have black twice. Or Bullet did, idk.

Bullet_Dodger: Note that 'black' is not a swear word. -.-

Lmao