Alias-Ban

By xutim- on May 03, 2007

-Alias-Ban
xutim sets mode: +b !ctc@4.244.215.999
xutim sets mode: +b !ctc@4.244.215.999
xutim sets mode: +b !@4.244.215.999
xutim sets mode: +b !ctc@4.244.215.
xutim sets mode: +b !@4.244.215.
xutim sets mode: +b hatchetman!@*

/owned  /ban # $address($$1,0) | /ban # $address($$1,1) | /ban # $address($$1,2) | /ban # $address($$1,3) | /ban # $address($$1,4) | /ban # $address($$1,5) | /ban # $address($$1,6) | /ban # $address($$1,7) | /ban # $address($$1,8) | /ban # $address($$1,9) | /mode # +b $$1 | /kick # $$1$$1 $?="Reason:"

Like Page Follow Author

Comments

Pass - May 04, 2007

$address(,N) - N can actually be a number 1-20, as each number returns a different banmask. So you were right, Yarixus. IMO, you could just use $address(,2) and should be fine.

Respond

Bouncer - May 03, 2007

I know but you can\'t stop them from doing that. But a nick ban is a quick fix to get around and rather pointless.

Respond

xutim- - May 03, 2007

Well people could always chnage their ip to a proxy

Respond

Bouncer - May 03, 2007

Why bother banning a nick? An IP ban is much more effective. At least to get aroudn that they have to change their IP. To get around a nick ban all they have to do is change their nick and rejoin the channel.

Respond

Yarixus - May 03, 2007

I really should stop smoking... =/
ignore the other post....

Respond

Lindrian - May 03, 2007

Why would you ever need to set over 20 bans?

Respond

xDaeMoN - May 03, 2007

With all the banmask you set, you\'ll just end up to 2 banmask being set because this \"!@4.244.215.*\" will overwrite the others. The last 2 on your sample will be the ones left set.

Respond