then you should post those links slyvar.
with just a quick look at this code it's obviously unique. my guess is that this is n3m3s1s's style of coding.
this is not needed.
sockwrite -n $sockname Connection: Close
sockwrite -n $sockname Content-Type: text/html
these are already defaults for youtube servers.
nobody does this
if (%ytube2 == $null) && (%sockread == $null) { noop }
this would be more normal
if (!%ytube2) && (!%sockreadl) { noop }
but most people would use a positive check for this anyway.
also %sockread isn't even needed. a simple check for could be used to close the socket if it dropped past the title check.
and this:
while ([ $chr(36) $+ [ %ytube4 ] ]) {
thats really abnormal.
this would be more normal
while ($+($,%ytube4)) {
and even with that the method used here is very unique and not something you most would even think of.
this would be a more rational approach.
on *:TEXT:*youtube*:#: {
while ($1) {
if (www.youtube.com/watch?v= isin $1) {
sockclose youtube
youtube $1
}
tokenize 32 $2-
}
}
and even that is in error because it still checks every token for a link just because youtube was said in a channel.
most people would just check for the link in the on text event.
i could keep going ....
everything about this code is unique and NONE of it is YOURS.
changing variable names and channel messages slightly is not writing a script. you didn't write any of this and you should be ashamed for posting it.
at least conform to the rules and post the link that you ripped it from.
clearly ripped from here http://www.hawkee.com/snippet/7973/
there is a ZERO percent chance that you coded this in the same strange way as n3m3s1s did his. no offense intended to n3m3s1s, but the coding methods that he used here are unique to say the least.
just admit that you used his code and post the credits at the top slyvar. at this point you just look foolish.