Eh? I don\'t understand what you mean?

Oh yeah, Russel, if you think you can make a better version, go ahead and try. No one\'s stopping you if you think mine is crappy. I just don\'t feel like bothering updating it, it\'s not worth my time.

Hmm..let\'s see. Because I said I\'d base the idea of my script off yours, not the code? Yeah, I thought so. My code looks much different from yours and it\'s more feature rich, although the game does work the same way. If it ain\'t broke, why fix it, y\'know? But I really don\'t see why I should give you credit just because I made a script of the same kind.

Like I said, this is out of date, for the best version, mirc.net.

Vengeance, how the hell is that complicated? That\'s not only redundant and poor coding, it\'s also extremely simple.

shugo103
-_- Let it be the way it is. There is nothing wrong with it no?

Besides the fact that you\'re denying suggestions to make it better? There\'s tons wrong with it that I can see.

This is a simple custom identifier where you enter two numbers and the asc value of a character to seperate them with and it gives you a list of numbers between the first two, sperated by the character you specify.

This deserves WAY more than a 6.5 =/

Hawkee really needs scorers that don\'t just hit 5/10

why UDP sockets? I never used them; they seem obsolete.

This is just a simple gaydar script. It's not very original, but it is fun. :)

And now for some real comments that will actually help people improve the script instead of patronizing them:

First off...it makes more sense to make on on dialog event and then use $devent and $did. For example:

On :Dialog:design::*:{
if ($devent == init) {
if ($did == 0 {
}
}
}

Also, I don\'t see the point of the echo in the on join event. The dialog also could use some alignment, and could be easier to use. The one cool point of this is the topic styles. One last thing, your readme assumes that everyone uses C:\Program Files\mirc.

Try these suggestions and it\'ll be a lot better. You could also add more options, such as botserv and chanserv (for some networks) and make the topics customizable. This has potential.

It\'s my choice whether I upload it or not. If you must know what bothers me:

There is a 1 megabyte limit on script submissions. Please do not include any executables with your script.

Only upload .zip files, nothing else will be accepted.

Script Updates need to use a different file name from the past.

Now please, for the new version, you must go to mirc.net. No exceptions, I\'m not uploading it here.

I can\'t update it because it\'s a .rar archive, and I can\'t be assed to submit it here, especially when mirc.net has a fine version of it. That, and I don\'t like Hawkee\'s submission guidelines, no offense.

This is wicked out of date and bad. Use the one on mirc.net I submitted there.

Is it just me or am I getting tired of hearing the reviewers say \"This script isn\'t that good, but it\'s great for beginners\". If a script sucks, it sucks, and we need to stop fluffing it up.

This could be done way better with ONE on rawmode event and some if statements.

It\'s honestly really simple and not very good at what it does, the readme has NO contact info whatsoever, and does indeed show bias to Anope. the script is also broken up into two files, which is unnecessary, and they\'re text files. Not .mrc files.

It\'s very basic, and poorly coded. For example, you have && ($2 != $me) in On Text events. This makes no sense, because on text CANNOT BE TRIGGERED BY YOU. Also, there is NO multi-channel support: The bot will autovoice, or not autovoice in any channel. The same goes for autoop and other options. Lastly, there are also NO spaces in between identifiers and other text on some options, meaning the identifiers won\'t work.

Okay, but room for improvement.

RoninWarrior, Hawkee is NOT the place to be looking if you want impressive mIRC scripting. Also, your raping of the English language disturbs me.

\"$calc(1*60))\"

C\'mon...not EVERYONE takes SUCH difficult math in their Freshman year, can\'t you just say 60?

There is no way to be constructive about this. I\'m sorry, but this is just a flat out waste of space that does nothing but flood.

o_O If there is a purpose to this, it\'s not visible.

yeah, I fixed that now. Thanks for pointing that out!

Well...This is just my variation on the pass the hbomb game. It's a variation of the Hot Potato Game, only the Potato is...a bomb!!! You have to pass the bomb and make sure you don't have it when it explodes! If you do..bad things will happen. It has a min/max bomb time, return to sender, bot can play, idle/away protection, difficulty levels, different punishments for losers, and all the settings can..

Well, I like the idea. It even inspired me to make my game (not a ripoff from your though!!) and put it on my bot. One question though... what\'s the point of %meplays, really? The events are all On Text...you\'d have to do an on input the exact same as the on text.

Because I can. Why question why I posted it? Someone might find it useful.

There should be some kind of limit on becoming the quote bot\'s owner, and the script could be cleaned up a bit both codewise and gramatically. However, it\'s still very good. :D

It\'s not bad. There should be some kind of limit on becoming the quote bot\'s owner, and the script could be cleaned up a bit both codewise and gramatically. However, it\'s still very good. :D

I dunno why I made this snippet. Basically what it does is if a user joins using n00b-irc or Java IRC they get kicked and banned. This is useful if you have a channel like #scripting where you only ask scripting questions or something like that.

Used as a custom identifier to turn a string of text into a line of $chr values.

This is a really easy-to-use slapper that adds/deletes slaps, and can do random, selected, and mass slaps. It also has a built in nicklist that updates when the list of users in a channel changes.